Assexmarkets Review: Is Assexmarkets Legit?
Assexmarkets Review 2025 shows a WikiFX score of 1.23/10, flagged for no valid regulation and risky operations.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Swiss National Bank spent 5.74 billion Swiss francs ($6.01 billion) on foreign currencies during the first quarter of 2022, it said on Thursday, scaling back its operations to curb the safe-haven franc’s strength versus the last quarter of 2021.

The figure was less than the 12.63 billion francs the SNB spent between October and December but more than the 296 million francs it spent during the first quarter of 2021.
The Swiss franc briefly rose above parity versus the euro at the start of 2022 as the reemergence of COVID-19 in China and the war in Ukraine sent investors looking for safe havens.
Foreign currency purchases have been a cornerstone of SNB policy for years to slow the appreciation of the franc, whose high value made life difficult for Swiss exporters by making their products more expensive abroad.
But the SNB this month said the franc, despite its high nominal valuation, was no longer highly valued due to higher inflation in other countries.
The SNB has switched its focus to increasing interest rates, raising its policy rate for the first time in 15 years to fight rising inflation in Switzerland.
On Thursday the euro was trading at around 0.9970 francs.
Analysts have said the SNB seemed to be accepting the francs higher value and was holding off from interventions at present.
Still the SNB has warned it could be active in the currency market, saying this month it would intervene to check an “excessive appreciation” of the franc and also consider selling foreign currency if the franc were to weaken.
($1 = 0.9557 Swiss francs)

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Assexmarkets Review 2025 shows a WikiFX score of 1.23/10, flagged for no valid regulation and risky operations.

RaiseFX Review reveals low WikiFX score, hidden withdrawal fees, and serious doubts about its trustworthiness.

WikiFX has launched the “Inside the Elite” Interview Series, featuring outstanding members of the newly formed Elite Committee. During the committee’s first offline gathering in Dubai, we conducted exclusive interviews and gained deeper insights into regional market dynamics and industry developments. Through this series, WikiFX aims to highlight the voices of professionals who are shaping the future of forex trading — from education and compliance to risk control, technology, and trader empowerment.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.