IG Review for India 2026: RBI Alert List, Regulation, Login, and Forex Risk
IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed charges against nine entities, including five individuals, for an alleged multimillion-dollar fraud scheme linked to pre-IPO investments, drawing in over 4,000 global investors.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has brought charges against five individuals and four entities allegedly involved in a substantial fraud scheme related to pre-initial public offering (IPO) investments. Among the accused are Raymond J. Pirrello, Jr., Marcello Follano, Robert Cassino, Anthony DiTucci, Joseph Rivera, and their respective companies. These defendants are believed to have engaged in deceptive practices that led to over $525 million in unregistered offerings.
These investments drew in more than 4,000 individuals globally, enticing them with promises of no upfront fees while covertly imposing undisclosed markups. This scheme resulted in illicit profits exceeding $88 million for the defendants and their associates.
As per the complaint, Sheldon Pollock, serving as the Associate Regional Director in the New York Regional Office, highlighted that the defendants allegedly marketed unregistered securities to investors, claiming no upfront fees while purportedly channelling tens of millions through undisclosed fees for their own gain.
The accused allegedly established an extensive network of unregistered sales agents who misled investors by falsely asserting the absence of upfront fees. In reality, investors faced substantial undisclosed markups, reaching as high as 150 percent, benefiting the defendants and their sales agents.
The individuals accused supposedly concealed Raymond J. Pirrello Jr.'s involvement, concealing his past SEC sanctions related to insider trading. The SEC's complaint, filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, levied multiple violations of antifraud, securities, and broker-dealer registration laws against the defendants. The SEC seeks a permanent injunction, restitution of ill-gotten gains, and civil penalties.

In recent times, the SEC has intensified its pursuit of companies failing to register with the agency. In the previous month, the regulator initiated legal action against Kraken, a San Francisco-based crypto exchange, for allegedly operating unregistered services, encompassing securities exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency activities.
The charges involve claims of commingling customers funds and crypto assets with Kraken's own, echoing accusations against Binance and Coinbase. The SEC alleges Kraken operated as an exchange, broker, dealer, and clearing agency without the necessary registrations.
Kraken responded by denying accusations of fraud or market manipulation, asserting that none of the alleged funds were missing or misused. However, while Kraken did not dispute the allegation of commingling funds, it clarified that the SEC did not claim any missing or misused customer funds.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.

Orbex, a Cyprus-based brokerage entity, has recorded 30 exposure complaints on WikiFX, a leading forex broker regulation inquiry tool, so far. Other review websites have also recorded a healthy number of complaints against the brokerage firm. These complaints largely talk about the alleged profit confiscations by the broker in the name of trading violations, difficulty in accessing fund withdrawals, capital losses due to artificial slippage, etc. In this Orbex review, we have investigated user complaints and provided a regulatory overview of the broker.

FCA warns Swift TradeX in a notice first published and updated on 1 September 2026. The UK Financial Conduct Authority says the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission, is not authorised, and may be targeting people in the UK. The notice names the website swifttradexai.com, a Worcester address and a UK telephone number, but also cautions that unauthorised businesses may use incorrect or borrowed contact details. The confirmed issue is authorisation status—not a court finding about every transaction. Anyone considering a payment should stop, verify the firm independently, and avoid using contact information supplied by the platform itself.

ThinkMarkets review for India: check the RBI Alert List, overseas entities, regulation, login security, forex rules, costs, withdrawals, and leverage risk.