IG Review for India 2026: RBI Alert List, Regulation, Login, and Forex Risk
IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:SEC settles for $1.83 million with Brian Sewell and Rockwell Capital over a fraudulent scheme involving 15 students and the non-existent Rockwell Fund.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission settled with Brian Sewell and Rockwell Capital Management for $1.83 million after accusing Sewell of defrauding 15 students of $1.2 million. The case has brought attention to the risks associated with cryptocurrency investments, especially when they come with unverified claims of cutting-edge trading strategies.
The issue originates from Sewell's establishment of the American Bitcoin Academy, an online course that claimed to teach students the subtleties of bitcoin trading. In early 2018–mid-2019, hundreds of his students believed in the Rockwell Fund. This hedge fund was projected to be a game-changing investing platform that would leverage AI and crypto-asset trading algorithms to generate high profits for its investors.
However, the SEC's inquiry into these assertions revealed a quite different reality. The inquiry proved that Sewell's claims were hollow: the Rockwell Fund never existed, and the complex trading tactics he spoke about were never established or applied. The cash gathered from the 15 pupils, totaling roughly $1.2 million, was redirected into Bitcoin ventures. The Bitcoins were stolen from Sewell's digital wallet, causing the assets to be lost.

Given these findings, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Sewell and Rockwell Capital Management for breaching federal securities laws' anti-fraud provisions. The case highlighted the importance of regulatory supervision in the fast-growing cryptocurrency market and the risk of substantial losses from misinformation-based investments.
Sewell and his company settled rather than contest the SEC's allegations. They agreed to pay $1.83 million in fines and prejudgment interest to settle the fraud charges against them. This settlement compensates the affected students and deters future fraud.
The SEC's Division of Enforcement Director, Gurbir S. Grewal, underscored the misleading nature of Sewell's acts, including false guarantees and nonexistent technology that Sewell utilized to entice investors into his scam. This example advises investors against high-return investments, especially in volatile and opaque cryptocurrencies. They should be cautious and critical to avoid such frauds.
Keep up with financial trends, expert opinions, and major developments at news.html" target="_self" style="color: rgb(46, 82, 153);">https://www.wikifx.com/en/news.html. Click now to stay ahead of the competition!

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.

FCA warns Swift TradeX in a notice first published and updated on 1 September 2026. The UK Financial Conduct Authority says the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission, is not authorised, and may be targeting people in the UK. The notice names the website swifttradexai.com, a Worcester address and a UK telephone number, but also cautions that unauthorised businesses may use incorrect or borrowed contact details. The confirmed issue is authorisation status—not a court finding about every transaction. Anyone considering a payment should stop, verify the firm independently, and avoid using contact information supplied by the platform itself.

ThinkMarkets review for India: check the RBI Alert List, overseas entities, regulation, login security, forex rules, costs, withdrawals, and leverage risk.

Did mirrox, a brokerage firm, ask you to keep your margin level above 250%-300% and make you add funds immediately if it dropped below it? Did the broker prevent you from opening a trade despite having a healthy equity balance? Did it close your trading account upon a withdrawal request? Many traders have raised these concerns online while sharing their respective mirrox reviews. This article aims to examine these user allegations while answering the popular question: Is mirrox legit or a scam?