IG Review for India 2026: RBI Alert List, Regulation, Login, and Forex Risk
IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:Major crypto exchanges, including Binance and OKX, received $78M in Tether via indirect transactions tied to a Hamas-linked entity, a report by Global Ledger reveals.

According to a recent blockchain forensics investigation, four major cryptocurrency exchanges and one payment processor acquired around $78 million in Tether (USDT) via indirect transactions related to a Hamas-affiliated business. Global Ledger performed the analysis, which was shared with crypto.news, and it offers insight into how digital assets are still exploited in illegal financial flows despite heightened regulatory attention.
Indirect Transactions Include Crypto Exchanges
According to the report, the TRON network received USDT transactions from Binance, OKX, Gate.io, Bybit, and Huione Pay. The top beneficiary was Binance, which received $46.9 million, followed by OKX with $17.7 million, Huione Pay with $11 million, Gate.io with $8.7 million, and Bybit with $4.6 million.
This money was reportedly tracked back to the Dubai Company for Exchange, commonly known as El-kahira for General Trading. On January 26, 2025, the Israeli National Bureau for Counter-Terror Financing (NBCTF) sanctioned this firm for allegedly giving financial assistance to Hamas, which Israel, the United States, and the European Union consider to be a terrorist organization.
“We have analyzed on-chain data and identified that the funds associated with the exchange in quotes (the one linked to Hamas) were transferred to multiple entities, with a significant portion being sent to centralized exchanges like Binance and others,” a Global Ledger representative said.

Fund Flow and US-Sanctioned Entities
The inquiry also discovered transactions with Garantex, a Russian-linked cryptocurrency exchange that was previously sanctioned by the US Treasury. According to the study, Garantex received more than $2.1 million in USDT and returned about $1.2 million.
Further investigation of the business found that it had processed over $155 million in USDT prior to the imposition of penalties by Israeli authorities. However, it is unclear if the cryptocurrency exchanges in issue froze this cash in response to the designation.
A Global Ledger spokeswoman explained, “We cannot confirm whether the money was frozen or not frozen until the Israeli authorities intervened.” Binance, OKX, Bybit, and Gate.io have yet to reply publicly to queries about these transactions.
The Role of Crypto in Illicit Financial Networks
The use of cryptocurrencies in financial crime is an increasing worry for regulators and law enforcement organizations throughout the world. This current disclosure follows claims from blockchain intelligence firm Elliptic, which identified Cambodian marketplace Huione Guarantee as a money laundering hotspot in July 2024. According to analysts, the site, which is tied to Cambodia's governing elite, has processed $70 billion in cryptocurrency transactions since 2021 and has been involved in frauds such as pig slaughtering.
Despite enhanced blockchain surveillance and forensics, criminals continue to use cryptocurrency networks for financial transactions. This recent research highlights the continuous issues authorities confront in avoiding the exploitation of digital assets while ensuring genuine use cases are not hampered.
As investigations continue, authorities may increase enforcement efforts to combat cryptocurrency-related financial crimes, particularly those involving sanctioned firms. Crypto exchanges are expected to face more scrutiny as regulatory agencies seek tougher compliance procedures to avoid the facilitation of illegal activities.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

IG review for India in 2026: see the RBI Alert List entry, overseas regulation, login checks, forex limits, and a clear broker safety checklist.

FCA warns Swift TradeX in a notice first published and updated on 1 September 2026. The UK Financial Conduct Authority says the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission, is not authorised, and may be targeting people in the UK. The notice names the website swifttradexai.com, a Worcester address and a UK telephone number, but also cautions that unauthorised businesses may use incorrect or borrowed contact details. The confirmed issue is authorisation status—not a court finding about every transaction. Anyone considering a payment should stop, verify the firm independently, and avoid using contact information supplied by the platform itself.

ThinkMarkets review for India: check the RBI Alert List, overseas entities, regulation, login security, forex rules, costs, withdrawals, and leverage risk.

Did mirrox, a brokerage firm, ask you to keep your margin level above 250%-300% and make you add funds immediately if it dropped below it? Did the broker prevent you from opening a trade despite having a healthy equity balance? Did it close your trading account upon a withdrawal request? Many traders have raised these concerns online while sharing their respective mirrox reviews. This article aims to examine these user allegations while answering the popular question: Is mirrox legit or a scam?