FCA Warns Against Multiple Unauthorised Forex Brokers
The FCA has issued warnings against several forex trading platforms operating without UK authorisation, while WikiFX records show that the brokers concerned lack valid forex regulatory licences.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:ASIC and FCA warn against unlicensed brokers. Learn which firms were flagged.

Financial authorities continue to flag platforms that provide trading services without valid authorization. These warnings are important for traders, as they signal firms that may pose risks to investor protection and market integrity. While some companies were listed as unregulated without a named authority, others were directly called out by well-known regulators such as ASIC in Australia and the UKs FCA.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) issued warnings against several brokers that were offering services without the necessary licenses. Traders dealing with these firms are exposed to high risks, as client funds are not protected under Australian law.
The UKs Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), known for its strict standards on investor protection, also issued warnings against a number of platforms. The FCA regularly updates its warning list to inform the public of firms operating without approval in the UK market.
When a broker appears on warning lists from regulators such as ASIC or the FCA, it indicates clear non-compliance with licensing requirements. Without regulatory supervision, traders face significant risks—ranging from frozen withdrawals to fraudulent schemes.
To avoid losses, traders are advised to always verify a brokers regulatory status before depositing funds. Independent platforms like WikiFX provide an accessible way to check licenses, read user feedback, and confirm whether a broker is truly authorized.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA has issued warnings against several forex trading platforms operating without UK authorisation, while WikiFX records show that the brokers concerned lack valid forex regulatory licences.

Orbex, a Cyprus-based brokerage entity, has recorded 30 exposure complaints on WikiFX, a leading forex broker regulation inquiry tool, so far. Other review websites have also recorded a healthy number of complaints against the brokerage firm. These complaints largely talk about the alleged profit confiscations by the broker in the name of trading violations, difficulty in accessing fund withdrawals, capital losses due to artificial slippage, etc. In this Orbex review, we have investigated user complaints and provided a regulatory overview of the broker.

Did mirrox, a brokerage firm, ask you to keep your margin level above 250%-300% and make you add funds immediately if it dropped below it? Did the broker prevent you from opening a trade despite having a healthy equity balance? Did it close your trading account upon a withdrawal request? Many traders have raised these concerns online while sharing their respective mirrox reviews. This article aims to examine these user allegations while answering the popular question: Is mirrox legit or a scam?

Neomarkets, a Kazakhstan-based brokerage firm, is facing some allegations of fund scams and unfair charges. These charges were reportedly on both deposits and withdrawals. As negative Neomarkets reviews became prominent on broker evaluation platforms, it was important to inspect these allegations and understand its regulatory scope. We have covered these in this article.