World Cup Fever Is Here! Choose your broker like you choose your team
Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:The broker restructured its business with a change of ownership in May 2021. It also underwent a major branding overhaul.

FCA-regulated 4T Markets Limited, formerly known as Formax Prime Capital (UK) Limited, published its annual financials ending on 31 March 2022, a period when it rebranded and resumed trading services.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
The company generated a turnover of £119,044 in the financial year 2022, compared to the 'restated' figure of £71,236 in the previous year. These were generated from the white-label clients of the brokerage. Despite a gross profit of £56,472, the administrative cost surged to £372,379, resulting in an operating loss of £270,907.
It ended the financial year with a loss of £271,466 compared to a loss of £216,860 in the previous 12 months, according to the latest Companies House filing.
After a downturn in business in 2018, the company had to re-evaluate its operating model and management structure. It initiated restructuring in 2019 that continued through the financial year 2022.
As a part of the restructuring, the entire ownership of the broker was transferred to Regalis Trading Solutions, which was completed in May 2021. The higher operating expense can be explained as the company “moved to a larger office and hired a full-time employee to take on the Compliance and Money Laundering Reporting Officer's position.”
The broker even underwent a major branding overhaul by changing its name to 4T Markets Limited and relaunching client trading activities in the first quarter of 2022.
“Delays in the implementation of the business plan have been, and still are being experienced due to effects of COVID-19 and also the uncertainty around the new rules relating to the financial services regulation after Brexit,” the Companies House filing stated.
Further, for operating under the FCAs purview, the company raised the permanent minimum requirement from a base capital figure of €125k to £150k.
“As there is no matched principal exemption under IFPR, the company will move to a PMR of £750k over a 5-year period. The Shareholder has injected additional capital to cover the minimum capital requirement, and senior management will ensure that the company is adequately capitalised during the transitional 5-year period to comply with the new regime,” the filing added.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Join WikiFX and investors worldwide in celebrating the excitement of the 2026 FIFA World Cup!

Have you experienced issues with Pepperstone deposit & withdrawal processing? From your experience, do you feel that the Australia-based forex broker causes losses to its clients? Did the brokerage entity freeze your account and give you a margin call? All these trading allegations have been rampant on broker review platforms such as WikiFX. This Pepperstone review article takes a close look at the user complaints, especially in 2026. Additionally, we have given an overview of the regulatory framework under which the brokerage entity operates.

Some broker comparisons end with a confident "go with this one." This is not one of them — and that honesty is exactly what makes it worth reading. Wundersys and tradgrip are two young, offshore-registered brokers that keep popping up in front of beginner traders, often through aggressive online marketing. Both promise the usual buffet: tight spreads, generous leverage, multiple account tiers. And both, according to WikiFX, sit near the very bottom of the safety scale. So instead of crowning a champion, this comparison is really about something more useful: learning to read the warning signs, understanding the small differences that still matter, and knowing why "the better of two risky options" is still a conversation about risk.

If you trade forex from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, or Nepal, you already know the quiet truth that eats into every trader's results: it is not just the market that decides whether you profit — it is the cost of getting in and out of each trade. Shave a couple of dollars off your commission on every lot, multiply it across hundreds of trades a year, and you are looking at the difference between a strategy that works and one that bleeds out slowly. South Asian traders are some of the most cost-conscious in the world, and rightly so. So we pulled the data on the brokers most often recommended for the region, cross-checked every name on WikiFX, and ranked them by the one number that matters most here: what they actually charge you to trade. Before the list, one quick lesson that will make this whole ranking click.